|
Check out
my new business website!
www.SeattleTacomaAppraisals.com |
|
June 29,
2007 |
|
New blog posted. |
|
ANNOUNCEMENT! 5/3 |
|
I just got back from a four-day trip to
Seoul. And just like every other time I've gone there, I'm
returning to Daegu kicking and screaming. Seoul is
amazing. The highlight of the trip, though was definitely
all the food in Itaewon (the foreign neighborhood). I
spent the weekend eating top-notch American food, Korean food,
Egyptian, Moroccan, Turkish and Mexican food. I even ate
American breakfast (at a small cafe called "America") for the
first time in over eleven months. The best word to
describe my feelings this weekend: "elation."
On another note, the website will be on Radio
Silence for a couple of months. This month is already
getting more and more hectic with everything I have to do before
I move back to the United States. Then the next month and
a half, I'll be traveling around the United States (eating a lot
of good food). So, expect another MASSIVE blog post in a
couple of months. Otherwise, hang in there, I'll be back
soon and we'll have coffee and laugh about all the silly stories
I'm going to tell you. |
|
The Way I See It: Number 437 |
|
On the Problems in this World |
|
And again this week, the world was witness to
another heinous crime in the United States. Although the
Virginia Tech Massacre was not nearly as large as, say, The
Beslan Massacre or Genocide in Darfur, it is extremely
noteworthy as the United States is neither poor nor located in a
war-torn region. The United States is one of the
wealthiest, smartest and most powerful nations on earth (okay,
okay, okay. It's the wealthiest, smartest and most
powerful). How can something so tragic occur on our soil
and how is it that this tragedy keeps happening over and over
and over again?
The shooter at Virginia Tech was a South
Korean National. That has South Koreans running scared.
Not from other South Koreans and not from the military might of
the United States, but out of the fear of a social backlash
against Koreans around the globe. First, I want to comfort
my Korean compatriots by saying that Americans most likely care
less that the shooter was Korean than that the act itself was
committed.
When I was comforting my boss with this fact,
however, I found a very vicious stereotype that should be
explained. She explained that the gunman was a national of
the Republic of Korea, but that he had been living in the United
States since 1992. He's more American than Korean at that
point! Her comments finally led to the fact that although
he was Korean, Koreans are not capable of committing such an act
and therefore, he only did it because he was exposed to all the
violence in the United States. I did nothing but agree
that there is too much violence in the United States. I
wish I could have argued the following at that time as well.
According to recent news articles, the
shooter's professor had been so appalled by the material in his
student's plays that he brought the work to college deans and
even the police for examination. CNN explained that these
plays involved killing students, killing professors and other
macabre acts. Of course, it sounds really disgusting to
hear that someone is drawing these things and, of course, if an
American were drawing these things we would be shocked an
appalled.
I, however, have lived in Korea for quite
some time and shed some light on this subject. My students
(who often bring toy guns to school without discipline) often
times show me their comic books that they buy with their
allowance money. On such comic is called "Happy Tree
Friends." This comic, a couple of weeks ago, showed a
person being nailed down and cut open. Pretty grotesque,
huh? How about this...A couple of weeks ago, one of my
students brought in a comic book that their friend had written.
It was so gory, I could hardly look at it. Yet all my
students huddled around to see all the blood in the book (that
included both a teacher and a waiter with multiple wounds
bleeding profusely). Sounds pretty violent, doesn't it?
It is a lot more violence than I saw when I was growing up.
Another very violent thing here in Korea is
all the video games. I definitely agree that violent
fighting games are inappropriate for children. In the
United States, video games are a highly regulated industry due
to the violence.
So, then, is America a more violent place to
grow up than Korea? I don't really think so. Why,
then are there so many violent crimes and school shootings in
the United States than in Korea?
Because we have guns.
Get guns out of the United States.
Get them out now. ----- |
|
The Way
They See It. |
|
Responses
to the Gun Control Argument |
|
1. Response from Olga
Valieva, April 19, 2007 |
|
So reading your blog I was glad that you took
time to discuss nationalities and what the kids are exposed to,
but I really have to say that I’ve always considered you to be a
very patriotic person. Owning guns is a right of all citizens,
and is protected by our constitution. The fact that a psychopath
chose to use guns to do evil rather than protection or sport was
a personal choice, not something the gun companies forced onto
him. Saying that guns are to blame is equal to saying that
McDonald’s is responsible for increased obesity. People need to
take responsibility for their actions, and in this case, that
person is dead so he cannot, and we cannot force him to.
Apparently people feel the need to point fingers at
someone/something. I would not have thought you to be the type
of person who would need to do the same thing. He was a product
of his environment. Whether kids in US or kids in Korea are
exposed to violence has little bearing on their actions. It is
how they are taught to react to it whether it is by parents,
peers, teachers, etc. I was brought up in the war, and saw very
grotesque things – not in pictures or comics, but in person. I
enjoy watching creepy thrillers and violent actions movies. I
was brought up around guns, I know how to use a gun, and if I
wanted to I can go buy a gun. Access to guns doesn’t mean I’m
going to go and massacre people. It was his choice. He’s clearly
demented, and he’s the only one to blame (and maybe his parents,
but sometimes one can’t help it if one’s offspring is crazy).
Sorry if this is bitchy, but to be honest
it’s really frustrating when things like this are said. I’m
really saddened by all this, especially since we had a fatal
shooting on our campus two weeks ago, but I don’t feel the need
to blame anyone for it. It sucks, but shit happens. The fact
that shit happens in poorer countries doesn’t make it more ok
than it happening here. It’s rare, and it’s tragic and sitting
there and finding reason for something so completely irrational
is… irrational. Take time to grieve, not to blame.
Anyways, that’s my rant. I still love you,
don’t worry. |
|
Rebuttle
from Owen Wagenhals, April 19, 2007 |
|
You are extremely right in
everything you said. Lets start with me being a patriotic
person. I know I am very patriotic. But being patriotic to me
includes standing up for what I believe in and disagreeing with
the government when I see fit. The second amendment is an
extremely antiquated law that dates back to a time when it was
imperative to own guns. Not only was it imperative to own guns
to protect your house and home, but the early Americans had to
protect this country using militias. The constant fear of
attack from France and the United Kingdom worried the early
Americans. Nobody would have joined this For a More Perfect
Union if they thought they'd be caught with their pants down
without guns when a French battalion wandered through town.
You also say that blaming
violence on the gun companies is just like blaming obesity on
McDonalds. You're totally right and it is wrong to blame
violence and obesity on these companies. In order to explain
this, let me back up. I support the Second Amendment. Or at
least, I want to support it. Everyone should be able to own a
gun. Except for one thing, people can't control themselves.
It's like when you give a dog too much food, it will eat until
it dies. That's like Americans and guns: if its there, they
have to use it. And why do we all have guns? To protect
ourselves from everyone else that owns guns. So, therefore, I
guess I don't support the Second Amendment.
There is also a severe
positive correlation between violent crime and developed
countries with lax gun control laws. The two prime examples are
Russia and the United States. Why is it that Northern European
countries have such low violent crime? They have no guns, so
their children grow up in a gun-free world. So they have a very
anti-crime mentality. People say that the best thing in the US
would be for gun education. They think that education against
guns is the best thing for children to bring them up away from
violence. But, isn't that then like teaching children about
eating healthy while at a party in the McDonald's Playplace? |
|
Response to Rebuttal by Olga
Valieva, April 19, 2007. |
|
This is one of those topics that will never
see an end…
Well you do make really good points, though:
As antiquated as the law is, it still has
uses in this day. Even if we don’t have wars on our soils, (I
was gonna go with the whole terrorist attack, but that’s so
cheesy), it is still important to protect yourself – and it
doesn’t necessarily have to be against those people with guns as
well. Hell someone can break into your house and gut you with a
knife or whatever else that can be used as a weapon. I do
believe that there need to be certain restrictions when it comes
to owning a gun, such as criminal background check, gun safety
and use classes, etc., but I still think that a person should
have a right to own a gun. Disarming the people will cause a
huge civil problem where they would feel powerless against an
armed government, and in the past, this has led to revolutions.
In European countries, and even in Canada, people are still
allowed to own guns – they don’t ban them. And it, I think, is a
purely societal reason why their crime rates are so much lower.
As far as people controlling themselves –
that’s the main problem. But we’re not animals (well, aside from
being apes and all), and yeah – if its there, it will be used,
so that goes back to the whole society problem. Along the same
lines, you would have to take away food from people and restrict
caloric intake because of all the health problems. You’d have to
restrict the sale of bleach or other household chemicals because
you can make a bomb with them. There are just so many things
that people can use as weapons if they need a weapon, and
abolishing these dangers is impossible. A democracy is difficult
to maintain – give people freedom, and in some sense you lose
control. And I think education is important – it won’t stop
idiots thought. Its like sex education – should we stop that too
because it’s not 100% effective in preventing STI’s and AIDS? So
should we outlaw sex too? Procreation only – come to the clinic
for your sperm and egg (well that’s a little ridiculous, but you
see my point). Its not that educating children will prevent them
from becoming violent; that’s the parents’ or communities’ jobs.
It’s more of an awareness issue. And yes, you can eat healthy at
McDonalds – they have salads now! Besides I was referring to
compulsive fast food peoples with poor eating habits, not the
occasional consumer.
Anyways I guess my point originally was that
it’s a societal issue rather than the manufacturer’s issue. And
I’m not THAT pro-second amendment –I just think its an important
right and should be support, and you should be able to protest
it as well if it no longer seems necessary. But at this day and
age, it still, unfortunately necessary. Besides, what about
hunting? (I guess we can always revert to the ol’ bow and
arrow). |
|
2. Response from
Jerome Dumortier, April 19, 2007. |
|
"Because we have guns. Get guns out of the
United States. Get them out now." was an end of the blog I
didn't expect. Well done. You are probably aware of the
discussion in the US that some people (too many) argue that it
would be better to allow packing heat on campus. One armed
student could have saved these lives. Unfortunately, my office
mate agrees with this argumentation. |
|
3. Response from
Stan Wagenhals, April 19, 2007. |
|
Gun control: I disagree.
When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns - my
favorite bumper sticker on the subject. Outlaws will always
have guns. All people with guns are not outlaws. The right to
keep and bear arms was well written by the framers. To me its
about the penalty for unlawful use of weapons of all kinds. An
armed robber should get a minimum sentence of 30 years hard
labor (to the betterment of society) without parole. A murderer
or armed rapist should have his gene pool terminated, without
delay!
The other part of this
equation, for me, is that the crazies will find a way to be
crazy, even if you take away their guns, or the right to
purchase them. Thank God these fools haven't discovered the
power of propane (that anybody can buy) or the killing capacity
of Chlorine gas like the idiots in Iraq have. The more people
on the planet, the more crazies are among us - not in shear
number but in numbers per capita.
Yes, I'm outraged and
saddened, sickened even. Those kids could have been my sons and
daughter. What really is our defense against these cretons?
Gun control? Or each of us trying to be the best person we can
be, helping those who exhibit signs of being disturbed or taking
an active role in intervention.
More on the subject... but
alas... out of time. |
|
Rebuttal
from Owen Wagenhals, April 19, 2007. |
|
You're right that then only outlaws will have
guns. But if guns are not even allowed in the United States, it
will become extremely difficult to obtain guns and then only the
really bad outlaws will have guns. Little Charlie down at the
Elementary School won’t go shoot up his class room. Nor will
Mrs. Smith Kill her husband after he had an affair. I know
stuff like that will still happen, but when guns are so easily
available, it is easier for people to justify doing this kind of
stuff. I don't think the same people would knife someone or
create some sort of bomb. And think about all of the people
that get killed on accident! Its disgusting, people are
protecting themselves from the outlaws and keep on shooting
their own children or the milkman or the mailman or the poolboy.
And what about all of the kids and even adults that get killed
just playing with guns! No, I am against guns. The second
amendment was made when the citizens of the United States NEEDED
guns. We needed guns because we didn't have a military and we
needed a militia. We also needed to protect ourselves. It
wasn't a nice area back then. We had to protect ourselves from
vagabonds, the British, the French, Native Americans, bears,
etc. Everything is totally different now. My other argument
still is look at other countries that have outlawed guns. They
are some of the safest countries in the world. Eg. Germany,
South Korea, Scandinavia, Japan. |
|
Response
to Rebuttal by Stan Wagenhals, April 19, 2007. |
|
Your argument is so right on. Congratulations on a well thought
out and convincing debate. In defense of my own argument I
raise one rhetorical query... what is the penalty for violent
crimes in the countries you cited?? |
|
Response to Response from
Owen Wagenhals, April 19, 2007. |
|
According to Wikipedia,
Capital Punishment is abolished in the European Union and most
other European states. It is also abolished in most of
Latin America (with the exception of Honduras and many Caribbean
States. Canada has also abolished the Death Penalty.
Japan retains its capital punishment laws. |
|
|
|
Beslan Massacre |
Plea for Darfur |
|
US Gun Politics |
Gun Violence in the USA |
|
|
|
Announcements |
|
April 17,
2007 |
|
Its been a
while since my last post (sorry!). So, just like last
time, I've posted another HUGE blog. There are plenty of
pictures and stories to keep you entertained. Enjoy!
PS. I'll be leaving Korea in roughly forty days. Can
you believe it!? |
|
March 12,
2007 |
|
There are a few new things that
you should check out. First off, I created a new tab on my
upper horizontal navigation bar. It is called the
"Campaigns" tab. Inside there, you will find all of the
information on issues that I am supporting such as the Plea for
Darfur and the Viaduct Vote. Also, I have a massive blog
posted because I haven't posted in a really long time.
Check it out! |
|
January
23, 2007 |
|
Do
you live within the boundaries of the city of Seattle? If
so, vote "Yes for the Tunnel" on March 13.
Voting will be imperative in getting our voice heard in
Olympia. It is the only way to receive state and federal
funding for this Seattle city-based
regional project. |
|
January
21, 2007 |
|
I
reformatted the Korea Portal. It's a bit easier to
navigate. |
|
November
1, 2006 |
|
I would like to do my part to
combat the evils of Genocide. Therefore, this link to my
plea for Darfur will be posted indefinitely. |
|
October
23, 2006 |
|
All of the
links are now functioning, except for in the Korea Diary section
of the Blog. Those are antiquated blogs and I did not want
to take time to edit the contents and hyperlinks of those pages. |
|
September
15, 2006 |
|
I would
prefer that this website have the capability for bilateral
communication between me and you, but I guess I'm just not that
technologically savvy. For the time being, I would love to
get as much feedback from you as possible. If you would
like to comment on any blog posts or on any content of the
website, please email me. I love hearing from everyone,
even if you're just calling to tell me I missed the last period
here in this sentence |
|